LASD confirmed they ran cell phone forensics. The post was removed. The data was never disclosed. When someone asked about the phone, the civilian search group was deleted.
As a former lawyer, my mind automatically goes to each and every word of a sentence to red flag any ambiguity and whether that ambiguity might be careless or suspicious.
Look at that one sentence again that refers to exploring phone forensics. It doesn't specifically state that they are exploring Monica's phone. The reference is not person specific. They could have been exploring forensics relating to her companions' phones.Or they could be sending researchers in the wrong direction to cover up the fact that they don't have Monica's phone.?
Smart thinking. You're right the MSAR language doesn't specify whose phone. "Cell phone forensic data to assist in identifying Monica's last known movements" could mean her device, Subject A's device, or a tower dump of everything active on that ridge.
That ambiguity makes the silence worse. Any of those datasets would tell you something about what happened. None of them have been disclosed. Updating the article with more clear language here. Thank you for the insightful comment.
Great work, as always. The Sentinel continues to typify the unapologetically unabashed disposition of someone we should all strive to emulate in our everyday life. The silent masses that have seen their narratives shaped through obfuscation and psy-ops are with you: I will follow this seeker of truth, this pursuer of justice, from the deserted hills that are swallowing up our most dear national assets, to the edges of the Jupiter Hill Zone and beyond.
Monica’s phone was reported dead and the tracking devices in her backpack were never detected. The companion she was with has a convenient photo timeline on his phone of their hike up mt waterman. I am glad you are asking the same questions that detectives are not able to find.
Monica’s phone was reported dead and the tracking devices in her backpack were never detected. The companion she was with has a convenient photo timeline on his phone of their hike up mt waterman. This particular hike she had never done with her yoga community. The usual weekly hikes are in different locations each time and with a group. This time it was with 1 person only, subject A! I am glad you are asking the same questions that detectives are not able to find.
The Sentinel continues to be the investigative spearhead of this case. Great work as always, and many thanks for the shout-out too!
Thank you for the support on this.
As a former lawyer, my mind automatically goes to each and every word of a sentence to red flag any ambiguity and whether that ambiguity might be careless or suspicious.
Look at that one sentence again that refers to exploring phone forensics. It doesn't specifically state that they are exploring Monica's phone. The reference is not person specific. They could have been exploring forensics relating to her companions' phones.Or they could be sending researchers in the wrong direction to cover up the fact that they don't have Monica's phone.?
Smart thinking. You're right the MSAR language doesn't specify whose phone. "Cell phone forensic data to assist in identifying Monica's last known movements" could mean her device, Subject A's device, or a tower dump of everything active on that ridge.
That ambiguity makes the silence worse. Any of those datasets would tell you something about what happened. None of them have been disclosed. Updating the article with more clear language here. Thank you for the insightful comment.
Great work, as always. The Sentinel continues to typify the unapologetically unabashed disposition of someone we should all strive to emulate in our everyday life. The silent masses that have seen their narratives shaped through obfuscation and psy-ops are with you: I will follow this seeker of truth, this pursuer of justice, from the deserted hills that are swallowing up our most dear national assets, to the edges of the Jupiter Hill Zone and beyond.
Monica’s phone was reported dead and the tracking devices in her backpack were never detected. The companion she was with has a convenient photo timeline on his phone of their hike up mt waterman. I am glad you are asking the same questions that detectives are not able to find.
Whitley Strieber, author of “Communion” and other books, just joined the chat:
https://whitleystrieber1.substack.com/p/the-possible-connection-between-the
Whitley Strieber is a subscriber to The Sentinel Briefing! Thank you for sharing this just made our day.
And another note, her cell number has been given away.
Monica’s phone was reported dead and the tracking devices in her backpack were never detected. The companion she was with has a convenient photo timeline on his phone of their hike up mt waterman. This particular hike she had never done with her yoga community. The usual weekly hikes are in different locations each time and with a group. This time it was with 1 person only, subject A! I am glad you are asking the same questions that detectives are not able to find.
Just gets creepier the more you read
Did subject a have any connections to the mk ultra crowd? Like these personal trainer people who Kanye says drugged him and other people?
A curious development - the Find a Grave memorial has been removed - https://subintelligenceagency.substack.com/p/update-suspicious-find-a-grave-online