LASD confirmed they ran cell phone forensics. The post was removed. The data was never disclosed. When someone asked about the phone, the civilian search group was deleted.
As a former lawyer, my mind automatically goes to each and every word of a sentence to red flag any ambiguity and whether that ambiguity might be careless or suspicious.
Look at that one sentence again that refers to exploring phone forensics. It doesn't specifically state that they are exploring Monica's phone. The reference is not person specific. They could have been exploring forensics relating to her companions' phones.Or they could be sending researchers in the wrong direction to cover up the fact that they don't have Monica's phone.?
Smart thinking. You're right the MSAR language doesn't specify whose phone. "Cell phone forensic data to assist in identifying Monica's last known movements" could mean her device, Subject A's device, or a tower dump of everything active on that ridge.
That ambiguity makes the silence worse. Any of those datasets would tell you something about what happened. None of them have been disclosed. Updating the article with more clear language here. Thank you for the insightful comment.
As a former lawyer, my mind automatically goes to each and every word of a sentence to red flag any ambiguity and whether that ambiguity might be careless or suspicious.
Look at that one sentence again that refers to exploring phone forensics. It doesn't specifically state that they are exploring Monica's phone. The reference is not person specific. They could have been exploring forensics relating to her companions' phones.Or they could be sending researchers in the wrong direction to cover up the fact that they don't have Monica's phone.?
Smart thinking. You're right the MSAR language doesn't specify whose phone. "Cell phone forensic data to assist in identifying Monica's last known movements" could mean her device, Subject A's device, or a tower dump of everything active on that ridge.
That ambiguity makes the silence worse. Any of those datasets would tell you something about what happened. None of them have been disclosed. Updating the article with more clear language here. Thank you for the insightful comment.
The Sentinel continues to be the investigative spearhead of this case. Great work as always, and many thanks for the shout-out too!
Thank you for the support on this.
Just gets creepier the more you read
Did subject a have any connections to the mk ultra crowd? Like these personal trainer people who Kanye says drugged him and other people?