So we got buzzed by a space probe with intelligence. Are they waiting for us to die to land, or will a planet eating resource gathering machine show up? If an intelligent entity is capable of intergalactic travel, we don't want ANYTHING to do with it. We are germs on a wet bumpy rock that can't figure out how to keep from dying.
Maybe the Maya's witnessed it created their calendar.
The Maya’s timekeeping was deeply tied to astronomy and cosmology, allowing them to predict celestial events with remarkable accuracy. Their calendar system is still used today in some Maya communities and remains a testament to their scientific and mathematical sophistication.
I find 3I/Atlas so fascinating even just as a measure of how society, government, and the scientific community respond to events that fall outside of the Overton window. Regardless of what the object *is*, everyone can learn something from the response that has been given to genuine scientific curiosity.
For the laypeople at home: what would we be looking for on March 16th, if anything? Who will be able to make observations if 3i/Atlas *were* to slip into a Jovian orbit/landing?
The institutional allergic reaction to anomalous data is half the story here. They want a safe consensus; we just want the raw telemetry.
To break down the March 16th Jupiter Intercept:
The Intercept: 3I/ATLAS is moving at 65 km/s on a hyperbolic escape trajectory. It’s going too fast for Jupiter to capture it, so there likely won't be a landing or an orbit. What we are looking for is a deployment. It is perfectly threading Jupiter’s Hill radius which is the exact gravitational boundary required to drop a payload into the system with maximum efficiency. We're watching the data for deceleration/acceleration or structural separation.
The Watchers: Who is watching? Everyone. NASA's Juno orbiter is already in the system. ESA's JUICE is actively tracking it, and the Deep Space Network and JWST will be monitoring its light curve for artificial thrust signatures. They might be playing it cool for the press, but behind closed doors, every sensor they have is dialed in.
Thank you for spelling it out for me; now that you say it I remember reading this at some point but I sort of binged all your posts on the weekend and I’m still trying to synthesise it all.
Have ESA been any more forthcoming with information? What about BRICS, any observational capabilities outside of American influence? I suppose everyone is either allied with the US or not public with their data…
It’s a lot to process, but the geopolitical reaction is definitely half the puzzle here.
The biggest indicator of how seriously the establishment is taking this isn't what they say. It's what they are doing. Right now, NASA, ESA, and the UN's International Asteroid Warning Network (IAWN) are running the largest planetary-defense exercise in human history, specifically targeting 3I/ATLAS. We have an article coming this week that will cover this more in depth. Officially, they claim it is just a convenient "training drill" to calibrate tracking networks. But operationally, this is a full-scale war game. They are treating this object exactly how they would treat a hostile incoming threat.
Because this operation is coordinated under the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), the data is subjected to strict, communication discipline. When ESA or NASA pulls data from the Deep Space Network or assets like Juno, it isn't piped directly to the public. It goes through the exercise's unified messaging protocols. Any odd acceleration, structural separation, or non-gravitational shift at the Jovian boundary will likely be scrubbed, quarantined, and re-evaluated internally. We aren't expecting a press release if something happens on March 16th. We are looking for the moment their feeds drop offline, or when their data gaps become impossible to ignore.
BRICS absolutely has independent observational capabilities outside the US/Five Eyes umbrella. They've been actively developing the BRICS Optical Transient Network (BRICS-OTN) to track astrophysical events. They do not have to rely on the sanitized American or European feeds.
Are they sharing what they see with the public? Of course not. Even in astropolitics, asymmetric data is leverage.
But if 3I/ATLAS executes an anomalous maneuver at the Jovian boundary next month, Beijing, Moscow, and New Delhi will have the raw, unscrubbed data. We will watch for where the cracks in the global consensus start forming.
I'm not saying its wrong, pay attention, he's using my work as hell.
everything in my first paragraph about him is true. you can VERIFY if you want to !
The data exists independently.
Everything I say in the other paragraphs is also true.
Are you able to calculate gravity without mass? are you able to calculate velocity of galaxies without dark matter or dark energy?
The data exists independently, you can VERIFY if you like.
Pay attention. Is not about me, you, Avi or anyone, is about US.
That's why I can state that he is not with "US", Avi loeb is all about "I" so if you send some important information he will just steal, if you lick his balls he will post your email in his blog.
So we all agree that the data stands alone and rosa and loeb are merely messengers of the data? If yes, we stand to benefit from understanding the data. Our personal feelings and attachments to the messengers matter not, in the grand scheme.
So we got buzzed by a space probe with intelligence. Are they waiting for us to die to land, or will a planet eating resource gathering machine show up? If an intelligent entity is capable of intergalactic travel, we don't want ANYTHING to do with it. We are germs on a wet bumpy rock that can't figure out how to keep from dying.
There’s the proof that will begin disclosure.
The President and Steven Spielberg seem to be on the same page about it.
Now we wait for them to tell us what the majority of the planet already knows…. There is life throughout the entire universe.
The timeline is very interesting right now isn't it?
It is!!! 👽🛸
Maybe it's alien technology - Mayan Clock.
Maybe the Maya's witnessed it created their calendar.
The Maya’s timekeeping was deeply tied to astronomy and cosmology, allowing them to predict celestial events with remarkable accuracy. Their calendar system is still used today in some Maya communities and remains a testament to their scientific and mathematical sophistication.
I find 3I/Atlas so fascinating even just as a measure of how society, government, and the scientific community respond to events that fall outside of the Overton window. Regardless of what the object *is*, everyone can learn something from the response that has been given to genuine scientific curiosity.
For the laypeople at home: what would we be looking for on March 16th, if anything? Who will be able to make observations if 3i/Atlas *were* to slip into a Jovian orbit/landing?
The institutional allergic reaction to anomalous data is half the story here. They want a safe consensus; we just want the raw telemetry.
To break down the March 16th Jupiter Intercept:
The Intercept: 3I/ATLAS is moving at 65 km/s on a hyperbolic escape trajectory. It’s going too fast for Jupiter to capture it, so there likely won't be a landing or an orbit. What we are looking for is a deployment. It is perfectly threading Jupiter’s Hill radius which is the exact gravitational boundary required to drop a payload into the system with maximum efficiency. We're watching the data for deceleration/acceleration or structural separation.
The Watchers: Who is watching? Everyone. NASA's Juno orbiter is already in the system. ESA's JUICE is actively tracking it, and the Deep Space Network and JWST will be monitoring its light curve for artificial thrust signatures. They might be playing it cool for the press, but behind closed doors, every sensor they have is dialed in.
Thank you for spelling it out for me; now that you say it I remember reading this at some point but I sort of binged all your posts on the weekend and I’m still trying to synthesise it all.
Have ESA been any more forthcoming with information? What about BRICS, any observational capabilities outside of American influence? I suppose everyone is either allied with the US or not public with their data…
It’s a lot to process, but the geopolitical reaction is definitely half the puzzle here.
The biggest indicator of how seriously the establishment is taking this isn't what they say. It's what they are doing. Right now, NASA, ESA, and the UN's International Asteroid Warning Network (IAWN) are running the largest planetary-defense exercise in human history, specifically targeting 3I/ATLAS. We have an article coming this week that will cover this more in depth. Officially, they claim it is just a convenient "training drill" to calibrate tracking networks. But operationally, this is a full-scale war game. They are treating this object exactly how they would treat a hostile incoming threat.
Because this operation is coordinated under the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), the data is subjected to strict, communication discipline. When ESA or NASA pulls data from the Deep Space Network or assets like Juno, it isn't piped directly to the public. It goes through the exercise's unified messaging protocols. Any odd acceleration, structural separation, or non-gravitational shift at the Jovian boundary will likely be scrubbed, quarantined, and re-evaluated internally. We aren't expecting a press release if something happens on March 16th. We are looking for the moment their feeds drop offline, or when their data gaps become impossible to ignore.
BRICS absolutely has independent observational capabilities outside the US/Five Eyes umbrella. They've been actively developing the BRICS Optical Transient Network (BRICS-OTN) to track astrophysical events. They do not have to rely on the sanitized American or European feeds.
Are they sharing what they see with the public? Of course not. Even in astropolitics, asymmetric data is leverage.
But if 3I/ATLAS executes an anomalous maneuver at the Jovian boundary next month, Beijing, Moscow, and New Delhi will have the raw, unscrubbed data. We will watch for where the cracks in the global consensus start forming.
Mind blown. 🤯
How can an outgassing ballistic object object generate rapid step change data? Hmmm?
Exciting! Thrilling!
Fuck Avi Loeb, the pud is desperate for attention.
The data exists independently of Avi Loeb.
So does sci-fi.
So no rational criticism of the data? Why even bother commenting then? Unless you’re the one who just wants attention.
Science isn’t a matter of opinion
The Q clock is based on three maya calendar and can predict future events .
Maybe that's why it's appearing now -
Why am I seeing this post? I neither follow nor subscribe to TheSentinel.
-/-
Is this a paid promotion?
It's not this, it's that. It's like this but....
I'm so SICK of stilly formatted Ai writing.
Nevertheless, the content is fuck'in fascinating.
Sounds like you had a bad personal experience with Avi Loeb. The data exists independently of Avi Loeb. We verified it.
Just to clarify, you cannot and will not ever separate what someone do to who this person IS. this is conscience.
if you really are willing to do something to US and not to YOU, you must consider reaching Mister Rosa.
I'm not saying its wrong, pay attention, he's using my work as hell.
everything in my first paragraph about him is true. you can VERIFY if you want to !
The data exists independently.
Everything I say in the other paragraphs is also true.
Are you able to calculate gravity without mass? are you able to calculate velocity of galaxies without dark matter or dark energy?
The data exists independently, you can VERIFY if you like.
Pay attention. Is not about me, you, Avi or anyone, is about US.
That's why I can state that he is not with "US", Avi loeb is all about "I" so if you send some important information he will just steal, if you lick his balls he will post your email in his blog.
So we all agree that the data stands alone and rosa and loeb are merely messengers of the data? If yes, we stand to benefit from understanding the data. Our personal feelings and attachments to the messengers matter not, in the grand scheme.
Of course who wouldn't like their balls licked?