Three contacts named on national TV. Two dead, one missing. The Sentinel Network forensic record of Elizondo's April-May 2026 proximity admissions, Imminent peer rhetoric, and the X account silence.
I will be the devil's semi-advocate here: Hal Putoff and Elizondo are Evil. But so is the DoE where Majestic-12 is co-housed (MJ12 has tentacles everywhere) . Hal and Louis belong to one faction (let's call them Power Mongers, Thiel, Musk, SilVal Rightwing Singularitarians) wanting a controlled choreogrpahed Disclosure that will benefit them while Maj12 and DoE, lets call them Control Freaks faction, are scared shitless that ANY kind of Disclosure, even one that is planned as pure puppetry by professional CoIntelPro AFOSI old hands, will go off the rails very fast even in best case initial conditions.
My theory: Amy was not killed by Elizondo, because Elizondo's faction boss, SilVal circles of TechBro's, want to reach godhood (literally) and the only way how to get that is via NHI Clarketech (aka Sufficiently Advanced Technology That Is Indistinguishable From Magic). Amy was right that both factions (even though she may have not realized there are at least two of them) want to control the narrative at the expense of the common man and that's why she called Elizondo and Puthoff evil. But I think she switched the motivations and perpetrators of her eventual death. I believe that in the particular cases of Eskridge and Childress it was the Legacy's work.
"It documented the TTSA insider equity, the 9 million stock options and 2.5 million restricted stock units the company’s officers and directors granted themselves, valued at nearly $19 million in pre-dilution insider equity awarded before retail investors were allowed to buy a single share." The lion's share of all of this went to DeLonge, his wife and the family trust. Only Semivan and Putoff are named in SEC filings as also receiving large grants. Elizondo joined TTSA about a month after these large grants were made.
The Sentinel doesn't directly accuse Elizondo of murder but quotes an anonymous X account as saying he should be treated as a suspect, nevertheless the overall tone of your article argues for his guilt. This makes me very very uncomfortable. So much so I have started going through the claims made in The Operator to see what I can verify. So far it's 0 for 2. The TTSA insider equity play above and the claim that Greenwald had verified a 300 person private Facebook group for coordinated harassment of Elizondo detractors. I can find nothing that substantiates this.
The Greenwald description of the 300-person Facebook coordination and the predicted Halloween racism incident is sourced to a recorded Red Panda Koala X Spaces conversation in which Greenwald spoke publicly. The piece has been updated with the direct link to the recording. The record stands.
Does Lue Elizondo have a current, or has he had a relatively recent, snailmail address in the UK?
How would you characterize his level of expertise in microbiology?
When you sort his contacts into categories by the rhetorical or narrative “register” in which he discusses them, is there another category or register in his discourse devoted to educators or colleagues in the microbiological field?
I will be the devil's semi-advocate here: Hal Putoff and Elizondo are Evil. But so is the DoE where Majestic-12 is co-housed (MJ12 has tentacles everywhere) . Hal and Louis belong to one faction (let's call them Power Mongers, Thiel, Musk, SilVal Rightwing Singularitarians) wanting a controlled choreogrpahed Disclosure that will benefit them while Maj12 and DoE, lets call them Control Freaks faction, are scared shitless that ANY kind of Disclosure, even one that is planned as pure puppetry by professional CoIntelPro AFOSI old hands, will go off the rails very fast even in best case initial conditions.
My theory: Amy was not killed by Elizondo, because Elizondo's faction boss, SilVal circles of TechBro's, want to reach godhood (literally) and the only way how to get that is via NHI Clarketech (aka Sufficiently Advanced Technology That Is Indistinguishable From Magic). Amy was right that both factions (even though she may have not realized there are at least two of them) want to control the narrative at the expense of the common man and that's why she called Elizondo and Puthoff evil. But I think she switched the motivations and perpetrators of her eventual death. I believe that in the particular cases of Eskridge and Childress it was the Legacy's work.
"It documented the TTSA insider equity, the 9 million stock options and 2.5 million restricted stock units the company’s officers and directors granted themselves, valued at nearly $19 million in pre-dilution insider equity awarded before retail investors were allowed to buy a single share." The lion's share of all of this went to DeLonge, his wife and the family trust. Only Semivan and Putoff are named in SEC filings as also receiving large grants. Elizondo joined TTSA about a month after these large grants were made.
See the UPDATE block in the Architecture section of the piece, which addresses the question of foundational-grant recipients per TTSA's SEC filings.
The Sentinel doesn't directly accuse Elizondo of murder but quotes an anonymous X account as saying he should be treated as a suspect, nevertheless the overall tone of your article argues for his guilt. This makes me very very uncomfortable. So much so I have started going through the claims made in The Operator to see what I can verify. So far it's 0 for 2. The TTSA insider equity play above and the claim that Greenwald had verified a 300 person private Facebook group for coordinated harassment of Elizondo detractors. I can find nothing that substantiates this.
The Greenwald description of the 300-person Facebook coordination and the predicted Halloween racism incident is sourced to a recorded Red Panda Koala X Spaces conversation in which Greenwald spoke publicly. The piece has been updated with the direct link to the recording. The record stands.
Does Lue Elizondo have a current, or has he had a relatively recent, snailmail address in the UK?
How would you characterize his level of expertise in microbiology?
When you sort his contacts into categories by the rhetorical or narrative “register” in which he discusses them, is there another category or register in his discourse devoted to educators or colleagues in the microbiological field?